Friday, December 30, 2011

IB Junior English Journal Response 25

Read Act 5

1) What is a tragedy?
2) Is the Wild Duck a tragedy? Explain.
3) Who is the tragic hero, why?
4) Are there any other characters who are tragic heroes?
5) Who is not a tragic hero, why?

Journal 5: The Wild Duck by Ibsen - (Tragedy)

1) A tragedy is a piece of literary work or a drama where one or more leading characters are eventually faced with devastation or extreme sadness. This is caused by a characters’ terrible weakness, personal failing, moral weakness, or the inability to cope with unfortunate situations that he or she could not deal with. The events that occur happen often through no fault of any character in the play.

2) I think that The Wild Duck is a tragedy because this play involves characters that have tragic or moral flaws that seriously damaged Hjalmar’s relationship with Gina. Each leading character meets devastation or sorrow depending on how much influence they had on their relationship.
For instance, Hjalmar’s moral flaw was that he had a strong tendency to pass the blame to someone except himself. When he forgets to bring the candy that he promised for Hedvig, in act two, he does not accept responsibility, but blames something else. Hjalmar states that, “I forgot to bring anything else, I tell you. But take my word for it: it’s bad business, this doting on sugar candy.” (144). This moral flaw was further amplified when Gregers told Hjalmar the truth about Gina’s past in act four. In act five, he starts blaming Hedvig saying, “She’s managed to blot the sun right out of my life.” (211).

3) In my opinion, the tragic hero is Hjalmar because he was one of the leading characters destined for downfall. His decisions with regards to his relationship with Gina were strongly influenced by Gregers’s input even though he was the head of the household. As the story progresses he develops accusations and misperceptions of Werle, Mrs. Sorby, and Hedvig. This happens every time Gregers intervenes and gives his opinions. Hjalmar’s tragic flaw was that he instantly supported all of Gregers’s opinions without question or thought to the consequences it would have on Gina, Hedvig, and Old Ekdal. Gregers unknowingly put immense pressure on Hjalmar because he was the son of Haakon Werle which represented money, power, and indebtedness. Such pressure put Hjalmar in a situation where he was not able to make the right and just decisions with regards to his relationship with Gina and Hedvig. He expresses his anger towards Gina in the quote, “Tell me - don’t you every day, every hour, regret this spider web of deception you’ve spun around me - (kicking at a chair.) my whole home - I owe it to a favored predecessor.” (183). Hjalmar blindly accepts the truth that Gregers gave him without considering the fourteen to fifteen years of good life with his family. In addition, he let his own emotions decide for himself. This resulted in the devastation of a relationship and death of Hedvig. Dr. Relling reflects on this situation saying, “We’ll be lectured on this when the first grass shows on her grave…you can hear him spewing out phrases about ‘the child torn too soon from her father’s heart,’ and you’ll have your chance to watch him souse himself in conceit and self-pity.” (216). Hedvig’s death affects Hjalmar’s outlook on life because he had a good relationship with her. Her death will also cause a blot in Hjalmar’s relationship with Gina. Eventually, his trust to society will not be the same anymore - always suspicious.

4) Gregers seems to be a tragic hero because his morals of “true marriage” were defeated when Hjalmar’s family was thrown into turmoil. It was his moral flaw to be too idealistic which affected his friend’s comfortable life of lies. Initially, he grew up in a life of torment with his father who was a philanderer and his mother who was the victim of the philanderer. Later in life, he worked in solitude at Hoidal works, not taking in any pay because he need time to think things over. After a while of working there, he came to the realization that his father was using women for their money. During Gregers’s converstation with Hjalmar the dinner party at Werle’s house, he came to the conclusion that Gina, his housekeeper, was married to Hjalmar as part of a set up. He found that Werle had disassociated himself with her by manipulating the situation so that Hjalmar would marry Gina. Gregers could not take his father’s abuse of women so he tried to talk it out with his father which was not successful. He eventually decided to make it his life’s mission to inform Hjalmar of the truth in hopes that he would live a “true marriage” and exclude Werle from his life. However, Hjalmar did not blame Werle for this but instead blamed his own family members. If Gregers wanted Hjalmar to know the full truth about his marriage, why was Hjalmar not informed that Werle had set up Old Ekdal to go to jail? What were Gregers’s real intentions toward his father? His downfall finally came when he admitted his destiny as the “thirteenth man at the table” (216) to Dr. Relling. In Norwegian Mythology, Loki was the thirteenth god to enter the Halls of Valhalla where twelve gods and goddesses were holding festivities. Here he killed Baldur, the son of the god Odin. This was confirmed by Dr. Relling when he said, “Oh, the hell you say” (216) which referred to Hel, one of the sons of Loki.

Gina is possibly a tragic hero because she had to keep a dark & shameful secret from Hjalmar. Her secret was that Haakon Werle forced himself on her. Her mom had advocated their relationship just because of money and power. This was an unfavorable circumstance for her. If she had informed Hjalmar about this, he would have reached a wiser decision, in my opinion. This was her personal failing that caused a major problem in her relationship with Hjalmar. Her relationship with Hjalmar is brought down when Hjalmar says, “Just answer me this: does Hedvig belong to me-or? Well!” (195). At that point, his trust for his own family is gone and there was nothing between him and Gina that prevented him from getting out the house. The final blow came when Hedvig died.

Hedvig is a tragic hero because of her tragic flaw of misunderstanding what Hjalmar means in most of his conversations. Hedvig shot herself after she heard her father say to Gregers, “If I asked her then: Hedvig are you willing to give up life for me?” (212). This is because of the extreme affection she had with her father after he had left the house as in the quote, “I think I’ll die from all this. What did I do to him? Mother, you’ve got to make him come home!” (196). She was confused and distraught as to why her father left. To her, her father was the puzzle piece that kept the family together.

5) Relling is not a tragic hero because he remained neutral in most of his encounters with Hjalmar and Gregers. He told the truth about them and did not cause conflict in his or anyone’s life. At one point in act three, he had warned Gregers that his belief in informing Hjalmar of the truth would be devastating to their relationship saying, “Can’t you see the man’s mad, crazy, out of his skull” (177). Mrs. Sorby is not a tragic hero as well because she did not intend to influence any character. She was just a “messenger” of Haakon Werle. In at one point act four, she speaks from Werle himself in order to show that he is making amends for his actions in the past. In addition she did not experience any devastation or downfall from any of her actions.


Additional Questions [Update]:



1) How does the author create catharsis?

2) Is there a way for the tragic hero to escape the events that are about to take place?

3) Do any of the characters face an internal struggle?



1) The author creates catharsis in Hjalmar, Gregers, and Gina.  Hjalmar goes through catharsis after Hedvig’s death when he says, “And I drove her from me like an animal…she crept terrified into the loft and died out of love for me…There she lies, so stiff and still.” (215).  Here he realizes that his family is worth more than the deception behind them through an intense emotional experience.  Gregers experiences catharsis when he was “glad my destiny is what it is…to be the thirteenth man at the table” (216).  Through Hedvig’s death he realizes that he was the one who ruined a family living comfortably under a lie.  Gina goes through catharsis when she states to Hjalmar that, “We must try to help each other.  For now, she belongs to us both, you know.” (215).



2) One way for Hjalmar to escape the tragic events that are about to take place is to stop Gregers from influencing him about anything anymore.  Once Hjalmar knows the truth, he should not let anger consume his comfortable life of lies.  He should accept fate as it is.  If he desires to be independent, he must make a gradual attempt to disassociate himself with Haakon Werle only when he can support himself comfortably.



3) Hjalmar, Hedvig, Gina, and Gregers are the leading characters that face internal struggle.  Hjalmar is caught between blaming his family members as in the quote, “The worst thing is precisely that I don’t know what to believe - that I’ll never know” (212). At first he blames Gina for not telling him the truth about her life. Then he starts to blame Dr. Relling in Act five for convincing him to work on inventing something.  Hedvig is caught in an internal struggle when she was faced with sacrificing the wild duck in return for her father’s happiness and family unity saying, “I’d slept then thought it over, it didn’t seem like so much.” (203).  Gina is faced with internal struggle when she had to tell Hjalmar about her previous relationship with Werle saying, “Well, you might as well know it all.” (183).  This showed that she had hesitated to speak the truth fearing that her relationship with Hjalmar might end.  Gregers is also faced with internal struggle when he was thinking about the corruption of Werle in Hoidal works saying that it was “Marvelously solitary…with a good chance to mull over a great many things”.  Gregers also has an internal struggle when he debates with Werle near the end of act one.  He sees the deception that Werle is putting around Hjalmar who is Gregers’s friend.  Gregers responds to this saying, “-and there he sits right now, he with his great, guileless, childlike mind plunged in deception - living under the same roof with the creature, not knowing that what he calls his home is built on a lie. (Coming a step closer) When I look back on all you’ve done, it’s as if I looked out over a battlefield with broken human beings on every side.” (135).  Gregers puts Werle’s past relationship with Gina under heavy criticism and blames his father for making Hjalmar live with that “creature”.  Another example of when Gregers is in internal struggle is when his father tells him that he should have spoken up about how he ruined Gregers’s life.  Gregers replies that, “I didn’t dare; I was so cowed and frightened…unspeakably afraid of you - both then and for a long time after.”  (175).  In short, he had smelled Werle’s treachery long before Hjalmar’s relationship.  He had a conflict with himself for so long just because he was afraid to tell his father about this.   

Sunday, December 25, 2011

IB Junior English Journal Response 24


Read Act 4

1) Consider which characters are at fault for the events that are unfolding and why? 
2) Is there a character without blame? 
3)  Why or why not? 
4) Is there a character who should carry more of the blame? 
5) Do any of the characters take responsibility?

Act 4 of The Wild Duck by Ibsen (Faults, Responsibility, and Blame)

1) So far in my opinion, the characters that are to blame are Hjalmar, Gina, Werle, Gregers, and Mrs. Sorby.

Werle is at fault because he had set up and manipulated the Ekdals while keeping himself out of the trouble.  For instance, the fact that Werle had a relationship with Gina who bore Hedvig made Hjalmar angry when he came to this realization.  This is shown in Gina’s quote, “He didn’t give up till he had his way.” (183). Werle had also set up Old Ekdal so he would take the consequences of illegal logging instead of himself and disregarded the fact that it would ruin the Ekdal family name.  If Werle had not done these deeds to the Ekdal family, then the conflict would not even have started.

Gregers on the other hand is also partly at fault because he has committed himself to letting Hjalmar know the truth about his family without taking into consideration the pain and bitter feelings that would perpetuate between Hjalmar and Gina.  His idealistic trait had ruined a happy family relationship with a past problem with the Werle family.

Hjalmar is at fault because he readily believes that the only truth about Gina was the one stated by Gregers. At the same time he allowed Gregers who has no experience of a married life to stay on and consistently allow him to interfere with the argument. Hjalmar also failed to consider the happy life he had with Gina and Hedvig in his decision for the past fourteen to fifteen years.

Gina is at fault because she did not inform Hjalmar before their marriage about her past life with  Werle. Whether Gina was forced by Werle against her will or not as long as she told Hjalmar the truth about her relationship with Werle, Hjalmar could have a choice whether to accept Gina as a wife or not.

Mrs. Sorby is at fault for the events that unfolded because she should not have given the legal letter to Hedvig who is not an adult.  Hedvig is prone to the influences of her parents so it would be natural for her to give the letter to her parents when they asked for it even though the letter was not to be opened until the next day.

2 & 3) Hedvig is a character without blame because she had not attempted to influence any characters’ thoughts and/or feelings.  For the most part, she was out of the scene.  Here, she was characterized by her reactions to the results of a family argument.

4) Hjalmar should carry more of the blame because he literally allowed Gregers to control his decisions in life.  As the head of the household Hjalmar should have asked Gregers to leave their house first because it is already a private and personal matter between Hjalmar and Gina.  Hjalmar should talk to Gina in private making sure that Hedvig does not overhear the conversation. Whatever the outcome may be, at least Gregers is not there to interfere or further escalate the situation with his comments.

5) Werle is a character who takes responsibility because he guarantees Old Ekdal with a monthly allowance of one-hundred crowns for the rest of his life.  When Old Ekdal dies, the payment will go to Hedvig for the rest of her life.  He also said thru Mrs. Sorby that if Hjalmar needed anything he could call on Graaberg. Gina is also a character who takes responsibility because when Hjalmar left house in anger after the argument she went out and looked for him to keep the family together again. Gregers seems to take responsibility because he professes that he was originally informing Hjalmar about his relationship so he could have a “true marriage”.  He acknowledged that what happened was not what he expected.  He asked Hedvig to kill the wild duck for her father as in the quote, “But what if you now, of your own free will, sacrificed the wild duck for his sake.” (197). Gregers thinks that the solution to the situation is to kill the wild duck so it would lessen Hjalmar’s anger.  He did not know that Hedvig did not understand what Hjalmar meant when he said, “That infernal wild duck - I’d almost like to wring its neck!” (180). He added, “I shouldn’t tolerate under my roof a creature that’s been in that man’s hands.” (181). In reality, Hjalmar was referring to Gina as the “wild duck”. 

Saturday, December 24, 2011

IB Junior English Journal Response 23

Read Act 3

Choose five quotations of interest to you. Discuss each quotations significance.

Act 3 of The Wild Duck by Ibsen (Quotations and Significance)

#1 Gregers says, “Even time doesn’t exist in there - with the wild duck.” (162)

Significance:
Hedvig’s interest with the wild duck makes her forget the time when she goes there.  Since she does not go to school, have any friends, is going to get blind soon, and has no home tutor, she has to find a diversion in the house in order to serve some purpose in life.  As a result, Hedvig creates her own world of fantasy where she reads books, devotes time to help her parents, cares for the wild duck, and draws. 

#2 Gregers says, “And actually, she’s been in the depths of the sea.” (164)

Significance:
On a literal level, the wild duck had stuck fast to the weeds and mire near the bottom of the sea after Werle had barely hit one of its wings.  It is the nature of an injured duck to hide underneath the water in order to escape additional injury if it stays above the water.  This statement could also apply to Hedvig.  No one really knows whose daughter is Hedvig.  She could be the result of Haakon Werle’s affair with Gina.  This Greger’s response to the last part of Hedvig’s comment on the wild duck, “There’s no one who knows her, and no one who knows where she’s come from, either.” (164).

#3 Hjalmar says, “Oh no, it’s my life’s work that stands before me day and night…I can raise his self-respect out of the dead by restoring the Ekdal name with dignity and honor.” (168)

Significance:
Hjalmar stated that his main goal in life is to find a way so that he could provide necessary care for Hedvig and restore Old Ekdal’s reputation.  However, this could possibly be a façade created by Hjalmar in order to hide some of his appalling traits such as his irresponsibility to his family, inefficient & negligent in his work (as being the “family breadwinner”), and the failure to tutor his child.  He escapes the daily toil by working with his father in the loft and his invention when he is inspired.

#4 Gregers says, “I wouldn’t say you’re wounded; but you’re wandering in a poisonous swamp.” (170)

Significance:
At this point of the play, Gregers is using symbols in order to give Hjalmar clues to the truth of Old Ekdal’s relationship with Haakon Werle.  However, Hjalmar does not understand this because Gregers seems to have a double meaning in most of his quotes.  Aside from the literal meaning, “poisonous swamp” mean the lie or façade that Hjalmar is living for is being controlled by Werle.  Werle’s intention could possibly be to use Hjalmar to care for Hedvig and Gina.

#5 Relling says, “he’s suffering from an acute case of moralistic fever.” (177)

Significance:
Relling had started to understand one personality trait of Gregers as an idealistic person.  In the past, Gregers was advocating the “Summons of the Ideal” where he almost had a run-in with Relling at Hoidal works.  Relling was implying that Gregers still brought his idealistic nature along with him to Hjalmar’s home.  

Friday, December 9, 2011

IB Junior English Journal Response 22


-Examine how characters perceive themselves or others.

-Who has false conceptions of him/herself?
-Who has misconceptions of others?
-Who recognizes the facades created by other characters? 
-Does the character embrace the facade, ignore it, or confront it?

You may choose to discuss any character(s) that interest in you Act 2.

___________________________________________________________________


The Wild Duck by Ibsen - Journal # 2


In Act Two of The Wild Duck, Ibsen creates characters whose perceptions of themselves are not really accurate.  One example of this would be Gina.

Gina:

Gina perceives herself as a person with a few simple morals that she stands by.  Gina thinks of herself as a person who is thoughtful of other people.  She believes that she wants others to feel welcome and not rejected.  This is shown when Gina advises Gregers to think before staying at her place saying, “But remember those two who live right below…well, I think you ought to sleep on it first, anyway.” (154).  Gina believes that she is being helpful because she is trying to prevent Gregers from getting into a conflict with one of the neighbors.  

Gina falsely perceives herself as more understanding than other characters.  For instance, when Hedvig wants to “read a little longer”, Gina replies “No, no - you must set the book down.  Your father doesn’t like it; he never reads in the evening” (117).  Gina is hindering her daughter's desire to do something that she enjoys.  Her perception of herself, as being considerate, does not match her actions.  Typical parents would usually allow at least a few minutes more for their child to read.

Gina misconceives some of the statements made by other characters.  For example, when Gregers wants his personality to be associated with a dog, Gina responds by saying, “Wasn’t that a queer business, his wanting to be a dog...what else could he mean?” (155).  This shows that she does not know the meaning behind what Gregers was saying.  She takes things literally when Gregers mentions that he wanted to be a “clever dog”.  Because she misinterpreted what Gregers says, she thinks of him as “queer”. 

There are some characters who recognize façades created by other characters like Gregers.  This brings us to talk about Gregers.

Gregers:

Gregers sees Ekdal’s façade of happiness in life.  He states this saying, “Without a doubt, you could get some copying to do up there; and here you have nothing in the world to stir your blood and make you happy.” (150). Edkal is an outdoorsman and lives in the city.  Gregers thinks that in order for Edkal to truly regain his happiness in life, he must go back to work at Hoidal.  Edkal, on the other hand, seems to be happy even without a job.  He sustains this façade of happiness by occasionally going out to hunt.  Edkal defends his façade when he replies, “I have nothing, nothing at all-!” (150).  Edkal starts to defend his façade by exaggerating the word “nothing”.  He later goes on talking about his experiences relating to hunting. Gregers reluctantly embraces this façade saying, "of course you have Hjalmar" (150). Gregers acknowledges that Hjalmar is the source of his happiness, but Hjalmar has his own life to live.  Gregers thinks that Ekdal has the opportunity to be “free and wild” and to be an independent person.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

IB Junior English Journal Response 21 (The Wild Duck)

In Act I of The Wild Duck, Ibsen creates several different types of boundaries.  These include social and internal boundaries.  Greger creates a social boundary between him and his father when the subject of marriage is brought to their attention.  He believes that Werle’s interest in Mrs. Sorby would affect the parent and son relationship when he asks, “When has there ever been family life here? Never, as long as I can remember.” (135).  Werle responds by attempting to make Greger empathize with him.  Throughout this portion of the act, both chracters use figure of speeches and euphemisms for certain terms.  Also, Greger’s choice of words change which reflect how he views his own father.

List of Other Boundaries in the Play:

-Emotional Boundaries (Greger and Werle)
-Occupation in Society (Merchant and Photographer)
-External Boundaries (Ekdal and Pattersen)